The Bush administration took steps to try to calm the furor in Congress over lost royalty payments on
The Interior Department announced a sharp increase in the royalties that will have to be paid on future deep-water drilling leases in the gulf.
Oil companies will have to pay the government 16.7% instead of 12.5% under any new lease agreements. The department estimated that would bring in an additional $4.5 billion over 20 years.
The move was widely viewed as an attempt to placate lawmakers who have been sharply critical of the department for its failure to get oil and gas companies to renegotiate flawed 1998 and 1999 leases that allowed companies to avoid royalty payments even when making record profits with current high oil prices.
House Democrats have put legislation to force changes in the questionable leases at the top of their energy that will come up for consideration next week. The oil companies argue the leases amount to contracts that should be honored, although a handful have agreed to pay royalties on future production under the leases.
Congressional auditors put the lost federal revenue at as much as $2 billion so far and estimated it could total as much as $10 billion over the life of the leases. The Minerals Management Service has disputed the severity of the losses, but it has acknowledged hundreds of millions of dollars will not be paid under the 1998 to 1999 leases because of the mistake.
The higher royalty rate — along with opening some new offshore areas for drilling — will "increase the revenue that the federal government collects from oil and gas companies on behalf of American taxpayers," Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said.
Democratic Reps. Edward Markey of
The rate increase "shows that the administration is finally beginning to awaken from its deep slumber on deep-water drilling," said Markey.
Hinchey said that while he welcomes steps to increase the government's revenue from offshore oil and gas production "that does not excuse the fact that hundreds of existing leases from 1998 and 1999 remain royalty free."
Because of a government error, the leases did not contain language that would have imposed royalties once oil or gas prices reached a certain level — one far exceeded by today's market prices.
Five companies recently reached agreement to pay royalties on future production from the leases. But more than 50 other companies have made no such commitments, most of them refusing to discuss the matter with the Minerals Management Service, which manages the leasing program.
Source: Associated Press
Recommended Reading
Logan Energy Closes Gran Tierra Joint Venture Acquisition
2024-12-18 - Logan Energy Corp. paid approximately $37 million for 50% working interests in Gran Tierra’s Simonette Montney assets and will assume operatorship.
Surge Closes on Divestment of Alberta Non-Core Gas Assets
2024-12-20 - Surge Energy said it has focused on developing its core Sparky and southeast Saskatchewan crude oil assets, leaving the Alberta non-core assets undercapitalized.
LandBridge Closes Deal for 46,000 Surface Acres in Delaware Basin
2024-12-20 - LandBridge Co., which held a successful IPO in August, added about 53,000 acres and now holds about 273,000 acres.
Kosmos Breaks Off Talks to Acquire UK’s Tullow
2024-12-17 - Kosmos Energy Ltd. gave no reason for breaking off acquisition talks with Tullow Oil, which the companies had said were at a preliminary stage.
Talos Sells More of Mexican Subsidiary to Billionaire Carlos Slim
2024-12-17 - Talos Energy has agreed to sell another 30.1% interest in subsidiary Talos Mexico to entities controlled by billionaire Carlos Slim, whose companies also own at least 24% of Talos Energy’s common stock.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.