Executives are keen to burnish their environmental credentials to investors and to press politicians for a seat at the table when it comes to tackling emissions, wrote Myles McCormick, Financial Times U.S. energy correspondent. (Source: Chevron Corp. / Hart Energy)
The last time I travelled to Houston, one item alone was top of the agenda for oil companies: climate.
From sit downs with executives and onstage panels, to conversations in hallways and evening drinks, the industry’s role in tackling emissions (or lack thereof) was the dominant theme the World Petroleum Congress three months ago.
But as Granholm’s recent comments make clear, the narrative has shifted. The war in Ukraine and the soaring prices it has triggered mean energy security has bumped climate down the agenda.
Still, executives are keen to burnish their environmental credentials to investors and to press politicians for a seat at the table when it comes to tackling emissions.
Darren Woods, CEO of Exxon Mobil, said the industry faced “two vitally important challenges: meeting the world’s energy needs and addressing climate change”—and should be given a role in deciding the approach to tackling both:
“With the challenge that we have with respect to managing climate change, I think the call is even greater for industry and governments to collaborate to make sure that the policy is being put in place and the direction that we’re going is thoughtful and balanced.”
Ryan Lance, ConocoPhillips CEO, was among many big names pushing for a carbon tax to shift the burden down the chain to consumers.
“We think the best way to impact the demand side of the equation is to make consumers understand the choices that they’re making.”
Lance also attacked the idea that oil producers should be responsible for so-called scope 3 emissions, those from the burning of their products.
“We think it’s irrational to hold our company or companies in our industry responsible for scope 3 emissions. Those are consumer-led choices that are in the consumers making those decisions.”
But it was Tengku Muhammad Taufik, CEO of Malaysian state-owned Petronas, who put the industry’s position most succinctly: “We are not the villains in this piece,” he said. “We’re part of the solution.”
This article is an excerpt of Energy Source, a twice-weekly energy newsletter from the Financial Times.
Recommended Reading
E&P Highlights: Dec. 30, 2024
2024-12-30 - Here’s a roundup of the latest E&P headlines, including a substantial decline in methane emissions from the Permian Basin and progress toward a final investment decision on Energy Transfer’s Lake Charles LNG project.
Shale Outlook: E&Ps Making More U-Turn Laterals, Problem-Free
2025-01-09 - Of the more than 70 horseshoe wells drilled to date, half came in the first nine months of 2024 as operators found 2-mile, single-section laterals more economic than a pair of 1-mile straight holes.
Formentera Joins EOG in Wildcatting South Texas’ Oily Pearsall Pay
2025-01-15 - Known in the past as a “heartbreak shale,” Formentera Partners is counting on bigger completions and longer laterals to crack the Pearsall code, Managing Partner Bryan Sheffield said. EOG Resources is also exploring the shale.
Classic Rock, New Wells: Permian Conventional Zones Gain Momentum
2024-12-02 - Spurned or simply ignored by the big publics, the Permian Basin’s conventional zones—the Central Basin Platform, Northwest Shelf and Eastern Shelf—remain playgrounds for independent producers.
Analysis: Middle Three Forks Bench Holds Vast Untapped Oil Potential
2025-01-07 - Williston Basin operators have mostly landed laterals in the shallower upper Three Forks bench. But the deeper middle Three Forks contains hundreds of millions of barrels of oil yet to be recovered, North Dakota state researchers report.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.