Executives are keen to burnish their environmental credentials to investors and to press politicians for a seat at the table when it comes to tackling emissions, wrote Myles McCormick, Financial Times U.S. energy correspondent. (Source: Chevron Corp. / Hart Energy)
The last time I travelled to Houston, one item alone was top of the agenda for oil companies: climate.
From sit downs with executives and onstage panels, to conversations in hallways and evening drinks, the industry’s role in tackling emissions (or lack thereof) was the dominant theme the World Petroleum Congress three months ago.
But as Granholm’s recent comments make clear, the narrative has shifted. The war in Ukraine and the soaring prices it has triggered mean energy security has bumped climate down the agenda.
Still, executives are keen to burnish their environmental credentials to investors and to press politicians for a seat at the table when it comes to tackling emissions.
Darren Woods, CEO of Exxon Mobil, said the industry faced “two vitally important challenges: meeting the world’s energy needs and addressing climate change”—and should be given a role in deciding the approach to tackling both:
“With the challenge that we have with respect to managing climate change, I think the call is even greater for industry and governments to collaborate to make sure that the policy is being put in place and the direction that we’re going is thoughtful and balanced.”
Ryan Lance, ConocoPhillips CEO, was among many big names pushing for a carbon tax to shift the burden down the chain to consumers.
“We think the best way to impact the demand side of the equation is to make consumers understand the choices that they’re making.”
Lance also attacked the idea that oil producers should be responsible for so-called scope 3 emissions, those from the burning of their products.
“We think it’s irrational to hold our company or companies in our industry responsible for scope 3 emissions. Those are consumer-led choices that are in the consumers making those decisions.”
But it was Tengku Muhammad Taufik, CEO of Malaysian state-owned Petronas, who put the industry’s position most succinctly: “We are not the villains in this piece,” he said. “We’re part of the solution.”
This article is an excerpt of Energy Source, a twice-weekly energy newsletter from the Financial Times.
Recommended Reading
Halliburton Secures Drilling Contract from Petrobras Offshore Brazil
2025-01-30 - Halliburton Co. said the contract expands its drilling services footprint in the presalt and post-salt areas for both development and exploration wells.
Microseismic Tech Breaks New Ground in CO2 Storage
2025-01-02 - Microseismic technology has proved its value in unconventional wells, and new applications could enable monitoring of sequestered CO2 and facilitate geothermal energy extraction.
AI-Shale Synergy: Experts Detail Transformational Ops Improvements
2025-01-17 - An abundance of data enables automation that saves time, cuts waste, speeds decision-making and sweetens the bottom line. Of course, there are challenges.
Small Steps: The Continuous Journey of Drilling Automation
2024-12-26 - Incremental improvements in drilling technology lead to significant advancements.
Exclusive: Novi Labs’ Ludwig on AI Preventing Costly Drilling Mistakes
2024-12-12 - Novi Labs President and Co-Founder Jon Ludwig gives insight on how AI and machine learning allow diverse applications for oil and gas operations and less risk for cataclysmic failure, in this Hart Energy Exclusive interview.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.