
Upstream deals have faced increased scrutiny as Congressional Democrats have demanded investigations over what they see as anti-competitive consolidation in the oil and gas sector. (Source: Shutterstock/ Chesapeake Energy/ Southwestern Energy)
Chesapeake Energy’s $7.4 billion merger with Southwestern Energy was delayed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), making it the latest large-scale upstream oil and gas deal to undergo more intensive review.
With time running out on the antitrust clock this week, the FTC notified the companies on April 4 that the agency wants more information about the merger, according to April 5 regulatory filings by Chesapeake and Southwestern.
The two companies are the top dual-basin natural gas producers in the Appalachia and Haynesville regions and would control much larger market shares in each.
The upshot is that the merger, which would create the largest U.S. natural gas producer, likely won’t close until the second half of 2024, analysts said.
Upstream deals have faced increased scrutiny as Congressional Democrats have demanded investigations over what they see as anti-competitive consolidation in the oil and gas sector.
The FTC’s issuance of a “Second Request”—until recently, a rarity for upstream deals—extends the waiting period imposed by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act by 30 days after Southwestern and Chesapeake complied with requests for additional information.
At Hart Energy’s DUG GAS+ Conference and Expo, Josh Viets, Chesapeake executive vice president and COO, said on March 28 that Chesapeake was nearing the end of a 30-day waiting period that would expire this week.
“If you don't receive comments, essentially, you consider yourself to be cleared to be able to move forward with … the closing of the transaction,” he said.
The FTC appears to have waited until the 11th hour to make a second request from the companies.
Chesapeake and Southwestern submitted required antitrust notifications to the FTC and the Department of Justice on Feb. 1, which set a March 4 timeframe for the FTC to request additional information. Viets said Chesapeake remained in a review period past that date after refiling its application for the merger.
“It’s a pretty typical process, they just simply needed more time,” Viets said. “If you follow the news, you know that the FTC has been incredibly busy of late.”
The agency has also filed second request notifications with Chevron and Hess Corp. related to a $53 billion merger as well as Exxon Mobil and Pioneer Natural Resources regarding their $60 billion deal.
While Chesapeake’s deal with Southwestern is relatively smaller at $7.4 billion, the combined company would be a force in the Haynesville and Appalachian basins. JP Morgan estimated the natural gas E&P would control about “21% of Appalachia’s gross production … and about 25% of Haynesville’s gross production.”
UBS analysts said that based on the second request, the timeline for the transaction's close has been pushed out to the second half of the year from the second quarter, according to an April 5 report.
“While a disappointment relative to the initial time frame for the transaction, the arb spread had widened out to >10% on an annualized basis, suggesting there was likelihood of a request coming in,” UBS said in an April 5 report.
UBS said the delay will show what Southwestern’s “volumes trajectory looks like this year on a standalone basis, which we believe will show declines into 1Q24 before having a shallow recovery back towards the 4.6 [Bcfe/d] level in 1Q25. We continue to see the transaction as positive for CHK, but remain Neutral based on our natural gas views.”
During Chesapeake’s Feb. 21 earnings call, an analyst posited to CEO Nick Dell'Osso that a second request from the FTC was likely.
Dell’Osso said Chesapeake had a tremendous amount of work ahead to integrate Southwestern, with teams set up to work through the organizational structure.
“We will be ready for a quick close,” he said. “We can continue to work on things from an integration standpoint. If it takes longer, we won't let that distract us or bother us in any way. We're well into the work required for a successful integration.”
Recommended Reading
Exxon CEO Darren Woods: Hydrogen Incentives ‘Critical’ for Now
2025-02-03 - Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods said the end goal for energy policy should be a system in which no fuel source remains dependent on government subsidies.
CEO: TotalEnergies to Expand US LNG Investment Over Next Decade
2025-02-06 - TotalEnergies' investments could include expansion projects at its Cameron LNG and Rio Grande LNG facilities on the Gulf of Mexico, CEO Patrick Pouyanne said.
Trump to Host Top US Oil Chief Executives as Trade Wars Loom
2025-03-19 - U.S. President Donald Trump will host top oil executives at the White House on March 19 as he charts plans to boost domestic energy production in the midst of falling crude prices and looming trade wars.
US Tariffs on Canada, Mexico Hit an Interconnected Crude System
2025-03-04 - Canadian producers and U.S. refiners are likely to continue at current business levels despite a brewing trade war, analysts say.
Belcher: Trump’s Policies Could Impact Global Energy Markets
2025-01-24 - At their worst, Trump’s new energy policies could restrict the movement of global commerce and at their best increase interest rates and costs.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.