Private operators are continuing their dominance in pulling new drilling permits in the Anadarko and Powder River basins and have regained their lead in the Haynesville Shale, D-J Basin and Williston Basin, according to a new report.
The overall ratio of new permits issued to private E&Ps remains on a monthly average between 39% and 46% this year, while public operators have been pulling the balance, according to J.P. Morgan Securities, citing Enverus data.
“The mix of private-company permits dropped to 40% [in May] after rebounding to 46% in April and compares [with] 39% in March and 45% in February,” analyst Arun Jayaram reported.
Overall, private operators received 478 permits for horizontals in May, compared with 707 pulled by public E&Ps, Jayaram wrote.
Among those, 53 permits were for new Delaware Basin wells, where public operators dominate, down from 160 permits in April. In the Midland Basin, private E&Ps received 181 permits, or 44% of total Midland permits, up from the 116 permits issued in April.
In the Eagle Ford, private operators pulled 36 permits at a third of the total issued that month; in the Powder River Basin, 12 permits were issued out of 13; and in the D-J Basin, 48 out of the total 70 permits were issued.
For May, across all basins and among all operators, J.P. Morgan counted 1,185 new permits for horizontals—roughly the same as April and March.
Among those, “public E&Ps received 707 permits—versus 604 permits in April and 628 permits in March—while privates received 478 permits, versus 528 permits in April and 395 permits in March,” Jayaram wrote.
Among public operators, pulling the most permits in May was Exxon Mobil with 90 permits, followed by Devon Energy with 74 permits, Jayaram reported.
Among total outstanding permits, EOG Resources has the most with 1,206 permits, followed by Exxon Mobil (983), Chevron Corp. (858), Devon (772), ConocoPhillips (566), Occidental Petroleum (559), Permian Resources (391) and Marathon Oil (293).
J.P. Morgan’s counts deduct antique permits, calculating “active permits” instead, “ignoring active permits for wells that are [already] active or have already been completed/abandoned,” Jayaram wrote.
“We consider ‘New Drill’ permits for oil, gas, oil and gas and confidential well types in our methodology of calculating approved permits for horizontal wells.”
Recommended Reading
McKinsey: Big GHG Mitigation Opportunities for Upstream Sector
2024-11-24 - Consulting firm McKinsey & Co. says a cooperative effort of upstream oil and gas companies could reduce the world’s emissions by 4% by 2030.
US Drillers Cut Oil, Gas Rigs for Second Week in a Row
2024-11-22 - The oil and gas rig count fell by one to 583 in the week to Nov. 22, the lowest since early September. Baker Hughes said that puts the total rig count down 39, or 6% below this time last year.
Water Management Called ‘Massive Headwind’ for Permian Operators
2024-11-21 - Amanda Brock, CEO of Aris Water Solutions, says multiple answers will be needed to solve the growing amounts of produced water generated by fracking.
Coterra Takes Harkey Sand ‘Row’ Show on the Road
2024-11-20 - With success to date in Harkey sandstone overlying the Wolfcamp, the company aims to make mega-DSUs in New Mexico with the 49,000-net-acre bolt-on of adjacent sections.
Suriname's Staatsolie Says Exxon has Withdrawn from Offshore Block
2024-11-20 - Suriname's state-run oil company Staatsolie said on Nov. 20 that U.S. oil giant Exxon Mobil has withdrawn from its offshore block 52, and block operator Petronas Suriname E&P will take over its 50% stake.
Comments
Add new comment
This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.